<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>plan9port/src/libmemlayer, branch patch</title>
<subtitle>Plan 9 from User Space (with patches)</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rctt.net/plan9port/'/>
<entry>
<title>all: clean up misleading indentation warnings</title>
<updated>2025-07-25T15:20:03+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Dan Cross</name>
<email>cross@gajendra.net</email>
</author>
<published>2025-07-25T15:20:03+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rctt.net/plan9port/commit/?id=655f7c3184fe2f1eb039211e689c2fe037fa8320'/>
<id>655f7c3184fe2f1eb039211e689c2fe037fa8320</id>
<content type='text'>
Misleading indentation warnings are actually useful, as they
will occasionally reveal actual bugs (cf the apple `goto fail`
security bug from a few years ago).  Newer versions of clang
(at least) are more aggressive about warnings in this regard,
which has exposed a few warnings that are annoying.  However,
they are easy to address.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Misleading indentation warnings are actually useful, as they
will occasionally reveal actual bugs (cf the apple `goto fail`
security bug from a few years ago).  Newer versions of clang
(at least) are more aggressive about warnings in this regard,
which has exposed a few warnings that are annoying.  However,
they are easy to address.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>separate out</title>
<updated>2006-06-25T18:58:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>rsc</name>
<email>devnull@localhost</email>
</author>
<published>2006-06-25T18:58:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rctt.net/plan9port/commit/?id=324891a5579d6f504201a6107369c64dab245a98'/>
<id>324891a5579d6f504201a6107369c64dab245a98</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
