| Internet-Draft | SOLEC | May 2026 |
| bt | Expires 27 November 2026 | [Page] |
This document describes working principles, features and network protocol of SOLEC system.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 November 2026.¶
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.¶
SOLEC is currently under development for PWR group project and as part of my engineering thesis.¶
System of Lightweight Electronic Communication or SOLEC is a system for decentralised communication designed for low-speed networks. It uses binary protocol to keep required bandwidth as low as possible.¶
Current implementation works on top of TCP/IP stack. In future, SOLEC will be adapted to work over LoRa.¶
Recurring problem with modern day instant messaging is its centralisation. SOLEC solves is it in similar fashion to XMPP or SMTP. SOLEC servers exchange messages between each other so the users using server A can reach out users using server B.¶
User can exchange messages with other users of the network if they are both in their contacts group. Messages from untrusted users are not forwarded by the server. If users are using different servers chat history is stored on both.¶
In current version session is provided by TCP connection. Security of client-server connection can be achieved using TLS.¶
SOLEC is using Type Length Value (TLV) structure for data exchange.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | Payload ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+¶
Figure: SOLEC PDU Layout¶
Type (8): Payload type is indicated by 1 octet which gives 256 types that can be represented.¶
Length (16): Payload length is 2 octets. It indicates length of the payload field. The length does not include type and length fields.¶
Payload (variable): Payload stores set of fields determined by its type.¶
Payload usually consist of one or more data fields but it is possible for payload to be empty. Some payload types are used only to signal some event and does not carry any data.¶
Data types are basic types that are used in construction of more complex payload types.¶
Numeric types are Big-Endian. Numeric types names are taken from Go language spec. Following types are in use:¶
Number in numeric type name is number of bits used to encode this type.¶
Uint64 containing Unix timestamp in UTC timezone.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Timestamp | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+¶
String is prefixed with two octets indicating number of bytes that it occupies. Text is encoded using UTF-8.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Length | UTF-8 string ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+¶
Figure: String Layout¶
Payload type attributes describes following characteristics:¶
| Type | Name | Attributes |
|---|---|---|
| 0x00 | R | |
| 0x01 | Success | SCE |
| 0x02 | Error | S |
| 0x03 | Handshake | SC |
| 0x04 | UserAuth | C |
| 0x05 | Message | SC |
| 0x06 | ServerAuth | S |
| 0x07 | UserMode | C |
| 0x08 | History. | C |
| 0xFF | Test | R |
| Type | Name |
|---|---|
| uint8 | error_type |
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| 0x01 | Client auth failed. Invalid username or password. |
| 0x02 | Not found. User or channel cannot access user or channel. |
| 0x03 | Unauthorized. |
| Type | Name |
|---|---|
| uint8 | ver_major |
| uint8 | ver_minor |
| uint8 | conn_type |
conn_type specifies type of the connection. User connecting to server
should use 0x01. If connection is initialize between two servers to exchange
message connection type should be 0x02. Depending on connection type
different auth method will be used.¶
| Type | Connection type |
|---|---|
| 0x01 | User -> Server |
| 0x02 | Server -> Server |
| Type | Name |
|---|---|
| string | name |
| Type | Name |
|---|---|
| string | source_address |
| string | target_address |
| timestamp | send_time |
| string | message_content |
Usermode payload is used for changing user settings related to channels. For example: joining, leaving or setting privilages.¶
| Type | Name |
|---|---|
| string | user_address |
| string | channel_address |
| uint8 | mode |
Read messages previously send to a specific channel. User has to member of the channel to perform this action. since field specifies start of time range for which history should be retrieved. count specifes how many messages should be returned in a single response. GetHistory is a locking sequence and it cannot be cancelled while in progress so count should be set relatively low. To get more messages use multiple requests with incremented offset.¶
Response is just a sequence of Message. Client should use Timestamp field of a Message to show them in corrent order.¶
| Type | Name |
|---|---|
| string | channel_address |
| timestamp | since |
| int64 | count |
| int64 | offset |
Some operations require multiple rounds of communication. In this case payloads are send in a sequence. Payload that is not part of this specific operation (for example incoming message) cannot interrupt this process.¶
+--------+ +--------+
| Client | | Server |
+----+---+ +----+---+
| |
| Initialise TCP connection |
+--------------------------->|
| |
| Send [Handshake] |
+--------------------------->|
| |
| +- If [ver_major] does not match
| | server protocol version close
| | the connection.
| |
| Send [UserAuth] |
+--------------------------->|
| |
| Send [Error 0x01] |
|<---------------------------+- If [username] or [password]
| | does not match and close
| | the connection.
| |
| Send [Sucesss] |
|<---------------------------+
¶
Exchanging messages between SOLEC servers is a core concept behind the project. Sending message to user residing on a different server require estabilishing a connection between both servers.¶
Server authentication is crucial to prevent message spoofing and other forms of abuse. Server cannot use same auth process as clients because that would require creating account for each server on any other server which is impossible. Possible solution are TLS or other public key based protocol.¶
As for now the issue remains open and server authorization uses mock [ServerAuth] payload which specifies just the connecting server name. This is obviously insecure.¶
+--------+ +--------+
| Server | | Server |
+----+---+ +----+---+
| |
| Initialise TCP connection |
+--------------------------->|
| |
| Send [Handshake] |
+--------------------------->|
| |
| +- If [ver_major] does not match
| | server protocol version close
| | the connection.
| |
| Send [ServerAuth] |
+--------------------------->|
| |
| Send [Sucesss] |
|<---------------------------+
¶